Can You Take Legal Action Years After Asbestos Exposure?

By Jamie Howell
Partner
In Mississippi, for a claim with no other limitation period set by statute, a cause of action involving latent injury or disease does not accrue until the injury is discovered, or by reasonable diligence should have been discovered. For asbestos disease, that usually shifts the starting point from the exposure to the discovery.

Yes. People diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness can often bring a claim decades after the exposure that caused it. For claims with no other limitation period set by statute, Mississippi law does not measure the deadline from the last day someone worked around asbestos. In those actions, a cause of action involving latent injury or disease does not accrue until the injury is discovered, or by reasonable diligence should have been discovered. That is why a mesothelioma or asbestos diagnosis today can support a claim over work done in the 1970s. Talk with a North Mississippi personal injury lawyer if you suspect your diagnosis could be related to asbestos exposure.

Why Asbestos Illness Often Appears Decades After the Job Ends

Asbestos fibers are small enough to breathe in unnoticed, and once they settle in lung tissue they stay. The National Cancer Institute reports that it can take from 10 to 40 years or more for symptoms of an asbestos-related condition to appear. A mesothelioma, asbestosis, or lung cancer diagnosis often arrives long after the exposure ends.

Serious exposure can happen on the job. OSHA reports that heavy exposures tend to occur in construction and in ship repair, particularly during removal of asbestos materials for renovation, repairs, or demolition. Workers are also likely to be exposed during the manufacture of asbestos products and during brake and clutch repair. The National Cancer Institute identifies further settings:

  • Asbestos mining, milling, and textile manufacturing
  • Insulation work in the construction and building trades
  • Shipbuilding trades
  • Demolition, drywall removal, and asbestos removal
  • Firefighting and automobile work

Families could have been exposed too. The National Cancer Institute reports some evidence that family members of heavily exposed workers face an increased risk of mesothelioma, thought to result from fibers carried home on clothing and hair.

How Mississippi Measures the Filing Deadline

Mississippi sets a general limitation period for claims with no other period prescribed by statute. Under Mississippi Code Ann. Section 15-1-49(1), those actions must be commenced within three years after the cause of action accrued.

The word accrued is what matters here. Subsection (2) provides that in actions for which no other period of limitation is prescribed and which involve latent injury or disease, the cause of action does not accrue until the plaintiff has discovered, or by reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury. Subsection (3) applies that rule to pending and later-filed actions.

The clock is therefore tied to discovery, not to the last shift a person may have worked around asbestos. That is not the same as having no deadline. Once the injury is discovered, time runs, and the rule reaches only claims with no other statutory period. The deadline depends on which claim is brought, so we review those dates at the first meeting.

Who May Be Responsible for the Exposure

Responsibility rarely rests with one company. Asbestos moved through the economy as a product, so a product liability claim often runs against the businesses that made and sold it.

The Mississippi Products Liability Act, Mississippi Code Ann. Section 11-1-63, governs those claims. A manufacturer, designer, or seller may be liable only if the claimant proves three things by a preponderance of the evidence. Each is measured as of the moment the product left that party’s control:

  • The product was defective;
  • The defect rendered it unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer; and,
  • The defect proximately caused the damages sought.

One listed defect category is a product that failed to contain adequate warnings. A warning case adds a knowledge requirement, measured at that same moment. The claimant must show the company knew, or in light of reasonably available knowledge should have known, of the danger, and that an ordinary user would not have realized the dangerous condition.

Other parties may be involved as well, including but not limited to:

  • Suppliers and distributors. The statute immunizes an innocent seller that is a mere conduit. That protection falls away if the seller exercised substantial control over the aspect of the product that caused the harm, altered it in a way that was a substantial factor in causing the harm, or had actual or constructive knowledge of the defect when it supplied the product.
  • Property owners and contractors who controlled the site. Whether a site owner answers for the exposure is a separate question under Mississippi premises liability law.

Employers stand apart. Under Mississippi Code Ann. Section 71-3-9, an employer’s liability to pay workers’ compensation is exclusive and replaces all other liability of that employer to the employee, the representatives and family members the statute lists, and anyone else otherwise entitled to recover from it. Limited exceptions apply.

Who counts as the employer is a separate question. Under Mississippi Code Ann. Section 71-3-7(6), where a subcontractor has not secured compensation, the contractor is liable for and must secure it for the subcontractor’s employees. Under Mississippi Code Ann. Section 71-3-71, accepting benefits does not affect the right to sue any other party for the same injury or death. The employer or its insurer is entitled to notice and may join, and a third-party recovery goes first to the costs of collection, then to what the employer or insurer is owed, with any excess to the injured worker.

What Compensation May Be Available

Mississippi’s damages cap statute, Mississippi Code Ann. Section 11-1-60(1), defines the two categories these cases turn on. Actual economic damages are objectively verifiable money losses such as medical care, rehabilitation, and loss of earnings and earning capacity. Noneconomic damages are subjective, nonpecuniary losses such as pain, suffering, mental anguish, and physical impairment. These definitions do not, by themselves, determine what is recoverable in a given case.

Under Mississippi Code Ann. Section 11-1-69, loss of enjoyment of life is recoverable in a personal injury case, but not as an element separate from pain and suffering.

The noneconomic portion is capped. Mississippi Code Ann. Section 11-1-60(2)(b) bars an award of more than $1 million in noneconomic damages in civil actions filed on or after September 1, 2004. The only actions that paragraph excludes are those for injury based on malpractice or breach of the standard of care against a health care provider, which the statute caps separately. Economic damages are not subject to either limit.

When the illness is fatal, a claim may be brought under the wrongful death statute, Mississippi Code Ann. Section 11-7-13, which may be maintained for strict liability in tort or any other cause of action known to the law. It sets an exclusive list of persons who may sue, including the personal representative and the family members it names, and requires a single suit for the same death. Damages include funeral, medical, property, and related expenses, along with the damages of every kind to the decedent and the interested parties that a jury finds just. Section 11-1-69(2) adds one limit. There is no recovery for loss of enjoyment of life caused by the death.

How We Build an Exposure Case That Reaches Back Decades

The hardest part of an old asbestos case is rarely the medicine. It is proving where the fibers came from, and that proof lives in records and memories 30 or 40 years old. We start by listening to the whole work history, job by job, site by site, and shift by shift, because clients remember what no document captured.

From there we look for corroboration:

  • Employment, union, and Social Security earnings records placing a person at a job site in given years
  • Product identification tying named brands of insulation, gaskets, or joint compound to that site
  • Statements from co-workers and family about daily conditions and take-home exposure
  • Medical records and pathology, read alongside opinions from qualified medical and occupational experts

We then match that history to the companies that supplied the products. This firm has roots in North Mississippi reaching back to 1932, and we handle an asbestos case the way we handle every one, by listening first.

Talk With a North Mississippi Asbestos Attorney

A diagnosis traced to a job you left decades ago can still support a claim, and the timing rules reward asking early. Chatham Gilder Howell Pittman serves injured people and grieving families from offices in Southaven and Hernando, Mississippi, and Memphis, Tennessee. There are no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. Contact us today for a free consultation.

About the Author
Jamie W. Howell, Jr. is a Partner at Chatham Gilder Howell Pittman and was admitted to the Mississippi Bar in 1988 and the Tennessee Bar in 1993. Mr. Howell is admitted to practice in all courts in Mississippi and Tennessee, including Federal Court, the Fifth and Sixth Circuit Courts of Appeal, and the United States Supreme Court. Mr. Howell's areas of practice include wrongful death, personal injury, criminal defense, Social Security Disability cases, and general civil law. For his first five years of practice, he was an associate attorney with Gilder Law Firm. After spending his next six years as a sole practitioner in DeSoto County, Mr. Howell joined forces with Jefferson D. Gilder to form Gilder & Howell, P.A. in June 2000. He is now a shareholder at Chatham Gilder Howell Pittman, which combined the talents of Gilder & Howell, P.A., and Chatham – Pittman. If you have any questions about this article, you can contact Mr. Howell through our contact form.